What If Gretzky and Lemieux Stayed Healthy?
A Gary Suter cross-check and a cancer diagnosis robbed hockey of its two greatest players at their peak. Here's what the numbers would have looked like.
The Moments That Changed Everything
This is the greatest "What If" in hockey history - maybe in all of sports.
Wayne Gretzky and Mario Lemieux were two of the most gifted athletes to ever play any sport. They were on a collision course toward numbers that would have been absolutely incomprehensible - numbers that would have stood for centuries. And then fate intervened in the cruelest way possible.
Wayne Gretzky: The Suter Hit (September 14, 1991)
Heading into the 1991 Canada Cup, Wayne Gretzky was still very much in his prime. He was 30 years old and had just finished a season where he posted 41 goals and 122 assists for 163 points in 78 games. He'd had some back issues dating to a hit from Alan Kerr in March 1990, but nothing that had seriously derailed him.
That all changed during Game 1 of the Canada Cup finals against Team USA. American defenseman Gary Suter cross-checked Gretzky from behind into the boards. Gretzky collapsed in pain and left the game. He tried to come back for the regular season but was never the same. His goal-scoring - the one area where the back injury truly ravaged his game - fell off a cliff. From 41 goals in 1990-91 to 31 the next year, then just 16 in 45 games the year after that when a herniated thoracic disc nearly ended his career entirely.
Those people who said Wayne Gretzky never gets hit - I guess I'm living proof that that's a lie. To me, this is not from one hit. It's the culmination of getting pounded night after night.
Wayne Gretzky, September 1992The doctors described it as a "one-in-a-million" injury - a herniated thoracic disc bulging into his spinal canal, putting tremendous pressure on a nerve running between his ribs. There was talk he might never play again. He did come back, of course, and he was still a dominant playmaker for years afterward. But the explosive, 50-goal-scoring Gretzky? Gone forever.
Before the injury, Gretzky's goal-scoring pace over his previous five full seasons averaged roughly 48 goals per 82 games. After the injury, he never topped 38 again. His assists remained strong - the hockey IQ doesn't go away - but the ability to drive to the net, to use that burst of speed, to shoot through contact? That was taken from him.
Mario Lemieux: Cancer, Back Surgeries, and 515 Missing Games
If Gretzky's story is about one defining moment, Lemieux's is about a decade-long series of catastrophes. His body was a ticking time bomb almost from the start of his career, and the cruelty of it is staggering when you consider what he did between the injuries.
The back problems started in 1989-90, limiting him to 59 games. By 1990-91, he could only manage 26 regular season games - though he still dominated the playoffs with 44 points in 23 games as the Penguins won their first Stanley Cup. Then came 1992-93, the season that defines Lemieux's legend and his tragedy in equal measure.
On January 12, 1993, the Penguins announced that their 27-year-old superstar had been diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma. He was leading the NHL with 104 points in 40 games at the time. He underwent 22 radiation treatments, and on March 2nd - the very morning of his final treatment - he flew to Philadelphia and played that night against the Flyers. The Philly fans gave him a standing ovation. He scored a goal and added an assist.
I've faced a lot of battles since I was really young, and I've always come out on top. I expect that will be the case with this disease.
Mario Lemieux, January 12, 1993He went on to finish with 160 points in just 60 games - a 2.67 points-per-game pace that remains the third-highest single-season rate in NHL history. But the radiation treatments left him exhausted. He played only 22 games the following season, then sat out the entire 1994-95 campaign. He came back and won the scoring title again in 1995-96 (161 points in 70 games), but retired in 1997 at just 31 years old. He returned for a second act in 2000 that was beautiful but hobbled by hip injuries and atrial fibrillation, finally retiring for good in 2005.
The raw numbers tell the story: Lemieux played 915 of a possible 1,430 regular season games during his career span. That's 515 games - more than six full seasons - stolen from him. And his per-game production when he DID play was arguably the most dominant in the history of the sport.
The Actual Numbers: What Really Happened
Before we get into the "What If" projections, let's lay out exactly what both players actually did - season by season. The red-highlighted rows are the injury-affected seasons, and you can see the damage in real time.
Wayne Gretzky - Actual NHL Career
| Season | Team | Age | GP | G | A | Pts | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1979-80 | Edmonton | 19 | 79 | 51 | 86 | 137 | |
| 1980-81 | Edmonton | 20 | 80 | 55 | 109 | 164 | |
| 1981-82 | Edmonton | 21 | 80 | 92 | 120 | 212 | |
| 1982-83 | Edmonton | 22 | 80 | 71 | 125 | 196 | |
| 1983-84 | Edmonton | 23 | 74 | 87 | 118 | 205 | Cup |
| 1984-85 | Edmonton | 24 | 80 | 73 | 135 | 208 | Cup |
| 1985-86 | Edmonton | 25 | 80 | 52 | 163 | 215 | |
| 1986-87 | Edmonton | 26 | 79 | 62 | 121 | 183 | Cup |
| 1987-88 | Edmonton | 27 | 64 | 40 | 109 | 149 | Cup |
| 1988-89 | Los Angeles | 28 | 78 | 54 | 114 | 168 | |
| 1989-90 | Los Angeles | 29 | 73 | 40 | 102 | 142 | |
| 1990-91 | Los Angeles | 30 | 78 | 41 | 122 | 163 | Last pre-injury season |
| 1991-92 | Los Angeles | 31 | 74 | 31 | 90 | 121 | Post-Suter |
| 1992-93 | Los Angeles | 32 | 45 | 16 | 49 | 65 | Herniated Disc |
| 1993-94 | Los Angeles | 33 | 81 | 38 | 92 | 130 | Art Ross |
| 1994-95 | Los Angeles | 34 | 48 | 11 | 37 | 48 | Lockout + Back |
| 1995-96 | LA / St. Louis | 35 | 80 | 23 | 79 | 102 | |
| 1996-97 | NY Rangers | 36 | 82 | 25 | 72 | 97 | |
| 1997-98 | NY Rangers | 37 | 82 | 23 | 67 | 90 | |
| 1998-99 | NY Rangers | 38 | 70 | 9 | 53 | 62 | Retired |
| NHL TOTALS | 1,487 | 894 | 1,963 | 2,857 |
Mario Lemieux - Actual NHL Career
| Season | Team | Age | GP | G | A | Pts | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984-85 | Pittsburgh | 19 | 73 | 43 | 57 | 100 | Calder Trophy |
| 1985-86 | Pittsburgh | 20 | 79 | 48 | 93 | 141 | |
| 1986-87 | Pittsburgh | 21 | 63 | 54 | 53 | 107 | Back |
| 1987-88 | Pittsburgh | 22 | 77 | 70 | 98 | 168 | Hart, Art Ross |
| 1988-89 | Pittsburgh | 23 | 76 | 85 | 114 | 199 | Art Ross |
| 1989-90 | Pittsburgh | 24 | 59 | 45 | 78 | 123 | Back |
| 1990-91 | Pittsburgh | 25 | 26 | 19 | 26 | 45 | Cup Back |
| 1991-92 | Pittsburgh | 26 | 64 | 44 | 87 | 131 | Cup |
| 1992-93 | Pittsburgh | 27 | 60 | 69 | 91 | 160 | Hodgkin's |
| 1993-94 | Pittsburgh | 28 | 22 | 17 | 20 | 37 | Surgery + Fatigue |
| 1994-95 | DID NOT PLAY | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Radiation Fatigue |
| 1995-96 | Pittsburgh | 30 | 70 | 69 | 92 | 161 | Hart, Art Ross |
| 1996-97 | Pittsburgh | 31 | 76 | 50 | 72 | 122 | Art Ross |
| 1997-98 | RETIRED | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | First Retirement |
| 1998-99 | RETIRED | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Retired |
| 1999-00 | RETIRED | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Retired |
| 2000-01 | Pittsburgh | 35 | 43 | 35 | 41 | 76 | Comeback |
| 2001-02 | Pittsburgh | 36 | 24 | 6 | 25 | 31 | Hip |
| 2002-03 | Pittsburgh | 37 | 67 | 28 | 63 | 91 | |
| 2003-04 | Pittsburgh | 38 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 9 | Back |
| 2005-06 | Pittsburgh | 40 | 26 | 7 | 15 | 22 | Heart (AFib) |
| NHL TOTALS | 915 | 690 | 1,033 | 1,723 |
The What If Projections
Here's the methodology. For each player, we took their per-game production rates from their healthy seasons, applied a standard age-related decline curve of roughly 5-7% per year (which is consistent with how elite players typically age), and projected full 80-game seasons. For seasons where they actually played and were relatively healthy, we kept their actual stats. For the lockout-shortened 1994-95 season, all projections use 48 games max.
These aren't fantasy numbers. They're conservative extrapolations based on what both players were actually doing when they were on the ice.
Gretzky - "What If Healthy" Career
Scenario: The Suter hit never happens. No herniated thoracic disc. Gretzky plays full seasons through 1998-99 retirement at age 38 with a natural, gradual decline in production.
| Season | Age | GP | G | A | Pts | Cum. G | Cum. Pts | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1979-80 | 19 | 79 | 51 | 86 | 137 | 51 | 137 | Actual |
| 1980-81 | 20 | 80 | 55 | 109 | 164 | 106 | 301 | Actual |
| 1981-82 | 21 | 80 | 92 | 120 | 212 | 198 | 513 | Actual |
| 1982-83 | 22 | 80 | 71 | 125 | 196 | 269 | 709 | Actual |
| 1983-84 | 23 | 74 | 87 | 118 | 205 | 356 | 914 | Actual |
| 1984-85 | 24 | 80 | 73 | 135 | 208 | 429 | 1,122 | Actual |
| 1985-86 | 25 | 80 | 52 | 163 | 215 | 481 | 1,337 | Actual |
| 1986-87 | 26 | 79 | 62 | 121 | 183 | 543 | 1,520 | Actual |
| 1987-88 | 27 | 64 | 40 | 109 | 149 | 583 | 1,669 | Actual |
| 1988-89 | 28 | 78 | 54 | 114 | 168 | 637 | 1,837 | Actual |
| 1989-90 | 29 | 73 | 40 | 102 | 142 | 677 | 1,979 | Actual |
| 1990-91 | 30 | 78 | 41 | 122 | 163 | 718 | 2,142 | Actual (last pre-injury) |
| 1991-92 | 31 | 80 | 39 | 115 | 154 | 757 | 2,296 | Projected |
| 1992-93 | 32 | 80 | 36 | 107 | 143 | 793 | 2,439 | Projected |
| 1993-94 | 33 | 80 | 33 | 99 | 132 | 826 | 2,571 | Projected |
| 1994-95 | 34 | 48 | 19 | 56 | 75 | 845 | 2,646 | Lockout |
| 1995-96 | 35 | 80 | 29 | 88 | 117 | 874 | 2,763 | Projected |
| 1996-97 | 36 | 82 | 26 | 80 | 106 | 900 | 2,869 | Projected |
| 1997-98 | 37 | 82 | 23 | 72 | 95 | 923 | 2,964 | Projected |
| 1998-99 | 38 | 75 | 19 | 62 | 81 | 942 | 3,045 | Projected |
| HEALTHY TOTAL | ~1,532 | ~942 | ~2,103 | ~3,045 |
Gretzky: 942 Goals, 3,045 Points
A healthy Gretzky likely finishes with nearly 950 career goals and over 3,000 career points. The 3,000-point barrier would have been shattered - and nobody else has even reached 2,000. His goals record would have sat at roughly 940-950, and if his back had held up for even one or two more seasons (ages 39-40), he'd have been knocking on the door of 1,000 goals.
The gap between him and everyone else in points would have grown from 936 (his actual lead over Messier) to well over 1,100 points.
Lemieux - "What If Healthy" Career
Scenario: No back problems, no Hodgkin's lymphoma, no radiation fatigue. Lemieux plays full 80-game seasons from 1984-85 through a natural retirement around 2003-04 (age 38). No first retirement, no comeback - just a continuous, dominant career. And remember - even at age 35, the actual, broken-down Lemieux put up 76 points in 43 games (1.77 PPG). A healthy Lemieux in his mid-30s is a terrifying thought.
| Season | Age | GP | G | A | Pts | Cum. G | Cum. Pts | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984-85 | 19 | 73 | 43 | 57 | 100 | 43 | 100 | Actual |
| 1985-86 | 20 | 79 | 48 | 93 | 141 | 91 | 241 | Actual |
| 1986-87 | 21 | 80 | 69 | 67 | 136 | 160 | 377 | Full Season |
| 1987-88 | 22 | 77 | 70 | 98 | 168 | 230 | 545 | Actual |
| 1988-89 | 23 | 76 | 85 | 114 | 199 | 315 | 744 | Actual |
| 1989-90 | 24 | 80 | 62 | 108 | 170 | 377 | 914 | Full Season |
| 1990-91 | 25 | 80 | 58 | 106 | 164 | 435 | 1,078 | Full Season |
| 1991-92 | 26 | 80 | 55 | 109 | 164 | 490 | 1,242 | Full Season |
| 1992-93 | 27 | 80 | 80 | 112 | 192 | 570 | 1,434 | Peak Year |
| 1993-94 | 28 | 80 | 72 | 104 | 176 | 642 | 1,610 | Projected |
| 1994-95 | 29 | 48 | 38 | 56 | 94 | 680 | 1,704 | Lockout |
| 1995-96 | 30 | 70 | 69 | 92 | 161 | 749 | 1,865 | Actual (close to projection) |
| 1996-97 | 31 | 80 | 58 | 86 | 144 | 807 | 2,009 | Full Season |
| 1997-98 | 32 | 80 | 50 | 78 | 128 | 857 | 2,137 | No Retirement |
| 1998-99 | 33 | 80 | 44 | 70 | 114 | 901 | 2,251 | Projected |
| 1999-00 | 34 | 80 | 38 | 62 | 100 | 939 | 2,351 | Projected |
| 2000-01 | 35 | 78 | 33 | 55 | 88 | 972 | 2,439 | Projected |
| 2001-02 | 36 | 76 | 28 | 48 | 76 | 1,000 | 2,515 | Projected |
| 2002-03 | 37 | 72 | 23 | 40 | 63 | 1,023 | 2,578 | Projected |
| 2003-04 | 38 | 68 | 18 | 33 | 51 | 1,041 | 2,629 | Final Season |
| HEALTHY TOTAL | ~1,517 | ~1,041 | ~1,588 | ~2,629 |
Lemieux: 1,041 Goals, 2,629 Points
A healthy Lemieux likely finishes with over 1,000 career goals and roughly 2,630 career points. Read that again. One thousand goals. Lemieux would have been the first - and probably still the only - player to ever crack the four-digit goal mark. And his point total would have closed the gap on Gretzky dramatically, making the GOAT debate one of the most compelling in all of sports.
Note how his actual 1995-96 comeback season (161 points in 70 games) essentially matches what our healthy projection would have been - and remember, that was a Lemieux still dealing with the aftereffects of cancer treatment. A truly healthy version of him might have been even better. These numbers are arguably conservative.
Actual vs. What If - Side by Side
#99 Wayne Gretzky
#66 Mario Lemieux
What Would Have Changed?
The Goals Record Would Have Been Untouchable
If both players had stayed healthy, the all-time goals record would have sat at approximately 942 (Gretzky) or 1,041 (Lemieux) heading into the 2000s. Alexander Ovechkin, who broke Gretzky's actual record of 894 goals in April 2025, would have been chasing a number well north of 1,000. That's an entirely different mountain to climb - one that probably stands forever. Even Ovechkin, arguably the greatest pure goal scorer who ever lived, would likely have fallen short.
The GOAT Debate Would Be Very Different
In reality, the Gretzky vs. Lemieux debate always comes with the qualifier "per game." Lemieux's supporters point to his 1.883 PPG vs. Gretzky's 1.921 and argue the gap is negligible. But Gretzky's supporters counter with the career totals - 2,857 points vs. 1,723 is such an enormous gulf that it makes the conversation feel lopsided.
In the "What If" universe? Gretzky finishes with ~3,045 points and Lemieux finishes with ~2,629. That gap of ~416 points is still significant, but it's WAY closer than the actual 1,134-point gap. And Lemieux would actually LEAD the all-time goals race with 1,041 to Gretzky's 942. Suddenly the debate isn't "Gretzky dominated career totals" - it's "Gretzky had more points but Lemieux had more goals." That's a genuine, raging, never-ending sports argument. The kind that fills bars at 2 AM.
Lemieux Becomes the First 1,000-Goal Scorer
Perhaps the most staggering element of this exercise is that a healthy Mario Lemieux very likely becomes the first player in NHL history to score 1,000 career goals. When you consider that only one player in the actual history of the NHL has ever reached 895 (Ovechkin, and it took him until age 39), the idea of someone clearing 1,000 is almost incomprehensible. And Gretzky isn't far behind at 942. The second-place finisher in the actual all-time goals list behind Ovechkin is Gretzky at 894, followed by Gordie Howe at 801. In this alternate universe, Lemieux is at 1,041, Gretzky at 942, and the next guy is nearly 250 goals behind. It's a two-man club that nobody else can touch.
The 3,000-Point Barrier
Nobody in NHL history has reached 2,000 career points other than Gretzky. A healthy Gretzky would have blown past 3,000. But here's what's wild - a healthy Lemieux would have been knocking on the door of 2,630. That's over 700 points clear of Jaromir Jagr's third-place total of 1,921. In this alternate universe, the top of the all-time points leaderboard looks like: Gretzky 3,045, Lemieux 2,629, and then daylight. The gap between second and third place (708 points) would be bigger than most stars accumulate in half their careers.
The Numbers That Should Have Been
Gary Suter's cross-check and Mario Lemieux's cancer diagnosis didn't just rob two players of personal milestones. They robbed the sport of what would have been the two most dominant statistical careers in the history of team sports. Period.
Between them, these two players left approximately 399 goals and 1,094 points on the table. That's not just one Hall of Fame career - that's practically two. Lemieux alone lost an estimated 351 goals and 906 points. An entire Brendan Shanahan or Luc Robitaille career, just... gone.
When people ask "What if?" in sports, this is the definitive answer. There is no bigger What If in hockey history.