Every spring, while fans argue about standings, professional athletes file up to 20 state tax returns each - one for nearly every jurisdiction they played a road game in. It is called the jock tax, it is very real, and it started as revenge: after California taxed the visiting Chicago Bulls following the 1991 Finals, Illinois passed a retaliation statute still nicknamed Michael Jordan's Revenge, and within a decade nearly every state with an income tax was billing visiting athletes for their duty days. This file audits what that whole machine actually does to a $10 million salary, jurisdiction by jurisdiction: federal tax, state tax, city tax, provincial tax, surtaxes, the 4 percent agent fee that stopped being deductible in 2018 - all of it run through one consistent model. The findings: the same contract is worth $4.22 million a year in one famous market and $5.70 million in another, a $1.48 million annual spread; six markets sit within $100,000 of the bottom; and the cheapest place to be a star in North America is not where most fans would guess. Every return in the pile is below.
Sports-King Feature
The Return Pile
A $10 million salary, one consistent model, and every jurisdiction's cut itemized - federal, state, provincial, city, surtax and the agent's four percent. The gap between the best and worst places to get paid: $1.48 million. Every single year.
By Sports-King
Up to 20 ReturnsFORM 540NR · CALIFORNIA NONRESIDENT
TAXPAYER: PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE
DUTY DAYS IN STATE: 11 OF 214
CA-SOURCE INCOME: $514,000
TAX DUE: SEE SCHEDULE CA
ATTACHMENT 1 OF 18 · DO NOT DETACH
Here is the part of a superstar's life nobody televises: filing season. A professional athlete's salary is apportioned by duty days - every game, practice, meeting and workday, credited to whichever state it happened in - and 41 states plus the District of Columbia tax nonresident athletes on their share. An NBA player files in as many as 16 to 20 jurisdictions a year; the league schedule is, functionally, a list of tax bills. That is the road layer. Underneath it sits the one that really moves the money: where the player lives and signs. So this file runs one player - $10 million a year, single filer, 2026 rates - through every kind of jurisdiction in North American sports, from the five-state Zero Club to the New York City stack, with the federal government, the payroll taxes, the surtaxes and a four percent agent fee (no longer deductible, thanks to the 2018 federal tax law) all itemized on one consistent model. The full methodology sits in the fine print, and every figure below comes out of the same arithmetic. The ranking runs worst take-home to best. Bring a calculator and a moving truck.
Returns Filed a SeasonUp to 20
The Floor - NYC Resident Keeps$4.22M
The Ceiling - Zero Club Keeps$5.70M
The Annual Spread$1.48M
01The New York StackKnicks, Nets, Rangers, Islanders, Yankees, Mets · the floor of North America
Resident ReturnForm IT-201 · New York State + NYCGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE (10.9% TOP) ....... -$1,090,000
NYC (3.876%) ............ -$388,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,221,000COMBINED STATE + CITY: 14.776% - THE HIGHEST SUBNATIONAL BITE IN US SPORTS
The worst pay stub in North American sports belongs to the most famous address in it. A player living in the five boroughs pays New York State's 10.9 percent top rate plus New York City's 3.876 percent resident tax - a combined 14.776 percent that outbites even California - and once the federal government and the agent take their shares, the $10 million contract deposits $4.22 million. That is the continent's floor: less than a Laker keeps, less than a Leaf keeps, forty-two cents on the gross dollar. The partial escape is famous and legal: live in Connecticut or across the river in New Jersey and the city's 3.876 disappears, which is why so many of the market's stars commute. But for the player who actually lives where he plays, the number is the number. The city that never sleeps bills accordingly.
02California15 major franchises · 13.3 top rate, plus the surtax nobody saw coming
Resident ReturnForm 540 · State of CaliforniaGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE (13.3% TOP) ....... -$1,330,000
SDI - UNCAPPED (1.3%) ... -$130,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,239,000THE 13.3 INCLUDES A 1% MENTAL HEALTH SURTAX; SDI LOST ITS CAP IN 2024 AND CLIMBS YEARLY
The famous villain, and the numbers earn the reputation. California's 13.3 percent top rate - which already includes a 1 percent mental-health surtax on income over $1 million - is the highest state income tax in America, and since 2024 the state's disability-insurance levy applies to every dollar of wages with no cap - and the rate has climbed to 1.3 percent for 2026. Total state-level bite: 14.6 percent, and a net of $4.24 million on our model - roughly $18,000 a year more than the New Yorker keeps, which is the entire difference between the two most expensive addresses in American sports. This is also the state that invented the modern jock tax by billing the 1991 Bulls, and it remains the machine's biggest beneficiary: California was collecting more than $229 million a year from athletes as far back as 2013. Fifteen major franchises play here. Their accountants earn every penny.
03OntarioLeafs, Raptors, Jays, Senators · 53.53 at the top, with company out west
Resident ReturnT1 General · Canada + OntarioGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL (33% TOP) ....... -$3,275,000
ONTARIO + SURTAX ........ -$2,038,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,282,000COMBINED TOP MARGINAL RATE: 53.53% - EVERY DOLLAR PAST $250K LOSES MORE THAN HALF
Canada's biggest sports market runs one of the continent's heaviest tax codes, and it does it with a mechanism most fans have never heard of: Ontario layers a surtax on top of its provincial tax - a tax on the tax - which drives the combined federal-provincial top rate to 53.53 percent. Past roughly a quarter million dollars, every additional dollar a Maple Leaf earns loses more than half of itself before it lands. Our model puts the take-home at $4.28 million, a few dollars ahead of Los Angeles and behind nobody's sympathy. British Columbia's Canucks live under a nearly identical 53.5, and Winnipeg's Jets around 50.4. This is the arithmetic behind every free-agency debate about Canadian teams overpaying - although, as the Record Book below shows, Canadian clubs and their accountants have built an entire toolkit for fighting it.
04Portland, OregonTrail Blazers · the quiet member of the bottom tier
Resident ReturnForm OR-40 · Oregon + Portland MetroGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE (9.9% TOP) ........ -$990,000
PORTLAND LOCAL (~4%) .... -$400,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,309,000THE LOCAL LAYER: A METRO HOMELESS-SERVICES TAX PLUS A COUNTY PRESCHOOL TAX
The entry nobody expects. Oregon's 9.9 percent top rate sounds merely high - until you add what Portland itself charges. A Trail Blazer living in the city pays a regional homeless-services tax and a Multnomah County preschool tax that together add roughly 4 percent at the top, pushing the combined state-and-local bite to about 13.9 percent: within touching distance of California, without the weather. The model's net is $4.31 million, which files Portland - a mid-size, one-team market - into the same bottom tier as New York, Los Angeles and Toronto. No market in the league has a bigger gap between its tax profile and its profile. The Record Book's free-agency footnote applies here with force: identical offers are never identical, and Portland's front office negotiates against that math every summer.
05QuebecCanadiens · the highest sticker rate, softened by a federal rebate
Resident ReturnTP-1 · Revenu Quebec + CanadaGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL, AFTER ABATEMENT -$2,735,000
QUEBEC (25.75% TOP) ..... -$2,545,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,316,000QUEBEC RESIDENTS GET A 16.5% FEDERAL ABATEMENT - THE STICKER RATE LIES SLIGHTLY
Montreal carries the scariest sticker in North American sports - a 25.75 percent provincial top rate, the highest subnational rate on the continent - and yet the Canadiens do not finish last in this audit, because of a quirk built into Canadian federalism: Quebec residents receive a 16.5 percent abatement on their federal tax, a rebate dating to the province running its own programs. Run the full arithmetic and the combined effective bite lands around 52.8 percent, a net of $4.32 million - a hair better than Toronto, which surprises nearly everyone who has spent a career hearing that Montreal is the worst tax address in hockey. It is still brutal: the Canadiens' front office has spent decades arguing that identical salaries are not identical offers. But the audit's finding stands - the most feared line on any pay stub in the sport is, once the rebate clears, not quite the worst one.
06New JerseyDevils, Giants, Jets · the escape hatch that is not much of an escape
Resident ReturnForm NJ-1040 · State of New JerseyGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE (10.75% TOP) ...... -$1,075,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,624,000NO CITY TAX - WHICH IS WHY MANHATTAN'S STARS KEEP MOVING ACROSS THE RIVER
New Jersey plays two roles in this file. As a home address, it is expensive on its own terms: a 10.75 percent top rate - among the highest in the country - takes the model's net to $4.62 million for the players of the Devils, Giants and Jets, whose stadiums all sit on the Jersey side. But as an escape hatch from entry 01, it works: no city-level income tax means a nominal Knick or Ranger who establishes residency across the Hudson erases New York City's 3.876 percent while still paying New York State on New York duty days - a six-figure annual difference that has quietly shaped where the region's athletes actually live for decades. The audit's note: an escape hatch that still charges 10.75 percent at the door is an escape hatch only by Manhattan standards.
07MinnesotaWild, Twins, Vikings, Timberwolves · four teams, one heavy flat top
Resident ReturnForm M1 · State of MinnesotaGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE (9.85% TOP) ....... -$985,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,714,000NO CITY TAX, NO SURTAX - JUST ONE OF THE STEEPEST STATE RATES IN THE UNION
Minnesota is the honest heavyweight of this file: no surtaxes, no municipal add-ons, no fine print - just a 9.85 percent top rate that ranks among the very steepest in the country, applied cleanly. Four major franchises' worth of players pay it, and the model nets $4.71 million: nearly half a million dollars a year less than the same contract in the Zero Club, and about half a million more than the same contract in Manhattan. That places the State of Hockey squarely in the audit's upper-middle of pain - expensive enough that agents raise it in every negotiation, not so expensive that it headlines the complaint. Minnesota's consolation to its athletes is the one this whole file keeps circling: the road schedule means a large slice of everyone's salary is taxed somewhere else anyway, and credits smooth the edges. The rate still leads the conversation every July.
08MassachusettsCeltics, Bruins, Red Sox, Patriots · the flat tax that grew a second floor
Resident ReturnForm 1 · Commonwealth of MassachusettsGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE (5% FLAT) ......... -$500,000
MILLIONAIRE SURTAX (4%) . -$400,000
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $4,799,000THE SURTAX APPLIES PAST ROUGHLY $1.1M - WHICH DESCRIBES EVERY STAR IN TOWN
For decades Massachusetts sold its athletes a simple deal: one flat rate, no drama. Then came the 2023 Fair Share Amendment - the millionaire surtax - which adds 4 percent to income above a threshold that sits around $1.1 million in 2026, a line that describes essentially every veteran contract in the city's four championship-hoarding franchises. The effective bill on our model: 9 percent, a net of $4.80 million, and a jurisdiction that jumped several places up this ranking overnight when the amendment passed. The surtax matters beyond Boston's payrolls, too, as the purest recent proof of this file's premise - that the map is not static. A player who signed a long-term deal in 2022 under one tax regime is finishing it under a meaningfully different one, and there was nothing his agent could do about it. The fine print always reserves the right to change.
09The City CollectorsPhiladelphia, Detroit, Cleveland, Columbus, Pittsburgh · where the municipality runs its own register
Resident ReturnCity Wage Tax Schedules · VariousPHILADELPHIA WAGE TAX ... ~3.75%
DETROIT RESIDENT ........ 2.4%
CLEVELAND / COLUMBUS .... 2.5%
PITTSBURGH FACILITY FEE . 3% - STRUCK DOWNPHILLY MODEL NET ........ $5,017,000PENNSYLVANIA'S 3.07% FLAT RATE IS GENTLE - UNTIL THE CITY HALL LINE HITS
Some of the jock tax's sharpest teeth belong to city halls, not statehouses. Pennsylvania charges a friendly flat 3.07 percent - and then Philadelphia adds a wage tax of roughly 3.75 percent that more than doubles the bill for every Sixer, Flyer, Phillie and Eagle living in the city, netting our model $5.02 million. Detroit takes 2.4 percent from its residents; Cleveland and Columbus take 2.5, and Cleveland's aggressive version of taxing visitors made legal history, as the Record Book details. And Pittsburgh ran a 3 percent facility fee on visiting athletes for two decades - roughly $79 million collected since 2005 - until Pennsylvania's Supreme Court struck it down for good in September 2025, with refunds now in motion: the rare case of the machine running in reverse. The lesson of this entry: read the second line of the address. The state often matters less than the city printed under it.
10The Flat MiddleArizona, Illinois, Colorado, Indiana, Georgia · the value tier
Resident ReturnThe Flat-Rate Tier · Selected StatesARIZONA (2.5% FLAT) ..... NET $5,449,000
INDIANA (~3% FLAT) ...... NET ~$5,400,000
COLORADO (4.4% FLAT) .... NET ~$5,260,000
ILLINOIS (4.95% FLAT) ... NET $5,204,000
GEORGIA (~5.2% FLAT) .... NET ~$5,180,000ARIZONA: THE LOWEST RATE OF ANY STATE THAT TAXES AT ALL
Between the horror stories and the Zero Club sits a broad, quietly efficient middle class: the flat-tax states. Arizona leads it with a 2.5 percent flat rate - the lowest of any state that levies an income tax at all - netting the model $5.45 million and making Phoenix one of the best-kept financial secrets in professional sports. Indiana, Colorado, Illinois and Georgia cluster behind it in the threes, fours and low fives, each netting between roughly $5.2 and $5.4 million. Chicago deserves its own line: for all its big-market reputation, Illinois charges a flat 4.95 with no city income tax - meaning a Bull or Blackhawk keeps nearly a million dollars a year more than a Knick on the identical contract, a fact that would have delighted the man whose name is on the revenge statute. The flat middle is where the tax map stops matching the market map entirely. One audit note applies here too: when a flat-state resident plays in California or New York, the road tax on those duty days exceeds his home-state credit, so real nets in this tier run a few tens of thousands lighter than the model line.
11The Zero ClubFlorida, Texas, Nevada, Washington, Tennessee · the ceiling - with one honest catch
Resident ReturnNo State Form RequiredGROSS SALARY ............ $10,000,000
FEDERAL + PAYROLL ....... -$3,901,000
STATE INCOME TAX ........ $0
AGENT FEE (4%) .......... -$400,000NET ..................... $5,699,000THE CATCH: ROAD DUTY DAYS STILL GET TAXED BY EVERY STATE VISITED - ESTIMATED $150,000-$200,000 A YEAR, WITH NO HOME CREDIT TO ABSORB IT
The ceiling. Five states host major professional franchises and tax wages at exactly nothing - Florida, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Tennessee, which repealed the last of its investment levy in 2021 and had already scrapped its flat per-game jock tax on visiting NBA and NHL players years earlier. Our model nets $5.70 million: a million and a half clear of Manhattan on the identical contract, which compounds over a four-year deal into a difference measured in houses. Now the honest catch, because this file promised an audit and not a brochure: the Zero Club does not escape the jock tax - its players still surrender road duty days to every taxing state they visit, an estimated $150,000 to $200,000 a year that a Floridian cannot credit against a home tax he does not pay. The zero is not quite zero. It is merely, by a comfortable seven figures, the best deal on the map - and every franchise in these five states negotiates with that card face-up on the table.
The Full Docket
The whole pile in one table - every jurisdiction's model output, worst take-home to best. Red rows are the bottom tier; the gold row is the ceiling. Figures are this file's model, method in the fine print.
| Rank | Jurisdiction | State / Prov + Local Bite | Tax + Agent, Total | $10M Keeps |
|---|
| 01 | New York City | 14.776% | $5,779,000 | $4,221,000 |
| 02 | California | 14.6% incl SDI | $5,761,000 | $4,239,000 |
| 03 | Ontario | 53.53% combined top | $5,718,000 | $4,282,000 |
| 04 | British Columbia | 53.5% combined top | $5,715,000 | $4,285,000 |
| 05 | Portland, Oregon | ~13.9% incl metro | $5,691,000 | $4,309,000 |
| 06 | Quebec | 52.8% eff. after abatement | $5,684,000 | $4,316,000 |
| 07 | Winnipeg / Manitoba | 50.4% combined top | $5,405,000 | $4,595,000 |
| 08 | New Jersey | 10.75% | $5,376,000 | $4,624,000 |
| 09 | Minnesota | 9.85% | $5,286,000 | $4,714,000 |
| 10 | Massachusetts | 9% incl surtax | $5,201,000 | $4,799,000 |
| 11 | Alberta | 47.6% combined eff. | $5,165,000 | $4,835,000 |
| 12 | Philadelphia | 3.07% + 3.75% city | $4,983,000 | $5,017,000 |
| 13 | Illinois | 4.95% flat | $4,796,000 | $5,204,000 |
| 14 | Arizona | 2.5% flat | $4,551,000 | $5,449,000 |
| 15 | The Zero Club - FL, TX, NV, WA, TN | 0% | $4,301,000 | $5,699,000 |
The Arithmetic
Three ways to read the pile: the full take-home ladder, the six-way race at the bottom, and one contract split open in two cities.
The Record Book
The margins of the pile: the revenge that built the system, the courtrooms that trimmed it, the capital city that legally cannot join it, and the toolkit Canadian teams use to fight their own map.
Michael Jordan's RevengeThe origin story, on the record: after the 1991 Finals, California assessed state income tax against the visiting Bulls - players, coaches, trainers, the traveling party. Illinois answered in 1992 with a statute Chicagoans still call Michael Jordan's Revenge, taxing the athletes of any state that taxed Illinois athletes. Other states read the revenue math and piled in, and the retaliation hardened into the system this whole file audits: 41 states plus DC now tax visiting athletes, staff included - trainers, coaches, even broadcasters travelling with the team. California, the instigator, remains the biggest winner; it was collecting north of $229 million a year from athletes as far back as 2013.
The Courts Push BackThe machine has lost in court, twice memorably. Cleveland taxed visiting players on a games-played formula - dividing salary by games rather than duty days, which massively inflated the city's share - until 2015, when Ohio's Supreme Court struck it down in cases brought by NFL players Jeff Saturday and Hunter Hillenmeyer; Saturday, unforgettably, had been taxed for a Cleveland game he missed with an injury while rehabbing in Indianapolis. And Pittsburgh charged nonresident athletes a 3 percent facility fee for two decades - locals paid less - until Pennsylvania's Supreme Court ended it for good in September 2025, near-unanimously, on a suit brought by the NHL, NFL and MLB players' unions; athletes are now pursuing refunds on roughly $79 million collected since 2005. Precedent, settled: the duty-day method won, and the cities that got greedy are writing the checks.
The Washington AnomalyOne capital cannot join the party. Federal law - the Home Rule Act - bars the District of Columbia from taxing the wages of nonresidents, which means visiting players face no DC income tax at all on Wizards and Capitals trips, an island of relief on the schedule. The wrinkle stacks further: the NFL's Washington franchise plays in Maryland, so its visitors answer to Annapolis instead. DC residents, meanwhile, pay a top local rate around 10.75 percent - meaning the one jurisdiction in America that cannot tax the away team taxes its own stars like New Jersey. The jock tax map is many things; fair and intuitive are not among them.
The Canadian ToolkitCanadian franchises negotiate against a 50-plus percent map, and their accountants fight back with structure. Retirement Compensation Arrangements let players park large salary slices in a deferral vehicle, smoothing tax into lower-rate years - a structure the CRA attacked and, against former Blue Jays Josh Donaldson and Russell Martin, lost at trial, with its appeal pending. Signing bonuses became the sharper tool: under the Canada-US treaty, a US-resident player's signing bonus from a Canadian club can be taxed at a treaty-capped 15 percent - the structure at the center of John Tavares's $8 million fight with the CRA over his $15.25 million Toronto signing bonus - still before the courts as of mid-2026, with Tavares stacking procedural wins, including orders forcing the CRA to open its own audit files - and the reason modern Canadian-team contracts arrive bonus-heavy. Add Alberta's comparatively gentle 48 percent combined top - the model nets $4.84 million in Calgary or Edmonton, best in Canada by half a million - and the border map has more doors in it than the sticker rates suggest.
Sports-King's Note
Now for the fine print
The model, in full, because every figure above came out of it: one player, $10 million in salary, single filer, no other income, 2026 rates. US federal tax computed on the current single-filer brackets (top rate 37 percent, roughly $3.66 million on this income) plus payroll taxes of about $244,000 - Social Security to its wage cap, Medicare at 1.45 percent and the 0.9 percent additional Medicare tax, all uncapped. State, provincial and city taxes are applied as top-bracket arithmetic on the full salary; the relief from lower brackets is under about $40,000 in every jurisdiction shown and is ignored for clarity, as is any residual federal deduction for state taxes, which current law caps at levels that round to nothing at this income. Canadian entries use the federal brackets to a 33 percent top rate, provincial top rates with Ontario's surtax folded in, Quebec's 16.5 percent federal abatement applied, and rates run on $10 million in local dollars - currency conversion is deliberately out of scope, so cross-border rows compare tax structure, not exchange rates. The agent fee is modeled at a flat 4 percent; actual caps and norms vary by league (lower in football, capped at 4 in basketball, negotiated in hockey, commonly up to around 5 in baseball) and the fee has not been deductible against US federal tax since the 2018 suspension of miscellaneous itemized deductions - the player pays tax on income the agent keeps - with Canadian employment-income rules similarly ungenerous. The residence-versus-road distinction matters and is handled honestly: the ranking models the residence bill, because resident-state credits mean road jock taxes mostly net out for players in taxing states; the exception is the Zero Club, whose players cannot credit road taxes against a home tax they do not pay, so their entry carries an estimated $150,000-$200,000 annual road layer, dependent on league and schedule, stated as the estimate it is; the same spread logic trims low-tax-state residents on a smaller scale - the uncredited difference when visiting higher-rate states - which shades the flat-middle nets a touch optimistic, by tens of thousands rather than hundreds. Rates cited follow the 2026 published figures: California 13.3 top including the mental-health surtax, with the SDI levy at its 2026 rate of 1.3 percent and its wage cap removed since 2024; New York 10.9 plus New York City's 3.876; New Jersey 10.75; Minnesota 9.85; Oregon 9.9 plus Portland-area local taxes approximating 4 at the top; Massachusetts 5 flat plus the 4 percent Fair Share surtax above its inflation-indexed threshold near $1.1 million; Pennsylvania 3.07 flat with Philadelphia's resident wage tax near 3.75; Arizona 2.5 flat; Illinois 4.95 flat; and combined Canadian top rates of 53.53 in Ontario, 53.5 in British Columbia, 50.4 in Manitoba, 25.75 provincially in Quebec before the abatement, and 48 in Alberta. The jock-tax mechanics - duty-day apportionment, 41 states plus DC taxing nonresident athletes, filing counts up to 20, the 1991-92 origin, the Cleveland and Pittsburgh litigation, the DC nonresident bar, the treaty treatment of signing bonuses and the still-active Tavares litigation - follow the published record and current professional guides. What this file is not: tax advice. It is a model with its assumptions in the open - a real player's bill turns on residency planning, bonus structure, deferrals, escrow, endorsement income and a platoon of professionals paid to bend every line above.
One Last Word
The strangest thing in the pile is not the $1.48 million spread. It is that the spread barely moves anyone. Stars still sign in Manhattan, in Los Angeles, in Toronto - because the endorsement money lives where the cameras live, because winning has no tax bracket, and because $4.2 million a year is still $4.2 million a year. The map punishes the paycheck, not the choice. But every agent in every negotiation knows the number, and somewhere in every contract file sits a one-page comparison that looks exactly like this article.
The hard numbers, for the road: yes, the jock tax is real - 41 states plus DC tax visiting athletes on duty-day-apportioned income, athletes file in as many as 20 jurisdictions a season, and the whole system descends from California billing the 1991 Bulls and Illinois answering with Michael Jordan's Revenge. On this file's $10 million model, the take-home ranges from $4.22 million for a New York City resident (the continent's heaviest combined bite at 14.776 percent state-plus-city) to $5.70 million in the five-state Zero Club - a $1.48 million annual spread - with California at $4.24 million once its uncapped disability levy is counted, Toronto at $4.28 million under a 53.53 percent combined top rate, Montreal rescued to $4.32 million by Quebec's federal abatement, Portland lurking at $4.31 million on local taxes nobody talks about, Alberta standing alone as Canada's discount at $4.84 million, and a 4 percent agent fee - non-deductible since 2018 - taken off the top of every single one. The register never closes, the map never stops mattering, and the return pile gets thicker every April.